Tweet
One of the interesting arguments made by Seung-ha is that, "as far as we know, you cannot copyright a game genre." While it is true that certain elements of a game, such as characters, places, and specific assets, can be copyrighted, the question of whether a game genre can be copyrighted is still up for debate. Games often borrow ideas and develop tropes from other games, and the only difference here is that Dark and Darker is not borrowing from an existing game, but from a prototype the developers themselves made.
The case of Dark and Darker also raises questions about ownership of ideas. In many game development contracts, the studio owns the intellectual property created by its employees. However, if an idea is pitched and worked on by a team within a studio, but ultimately rejected by the studio, who owns the idea? Is it the studio's idea because it happened under its roof, or the individual or team's idea who had the idea, cultivated it, raised it, and perfected it, only to have it thrown in the trash?
The language used by Ironmace's website, which describes the studio as a "by the gamers, for the gamers" establishment, suggests that they are trying to position themselves as the underdog fighting against greedy corporate game companies. However, it is important to note that we are only getting one side of the story. The game has been pulled from Steam until the matter is settled, and it is foolish to take the word of one party without hearing the other side.
It is also worth considering the potential consequences of this case beyond Dark and Darker. If Ironmace is successful in proving that game genres cannot be copyrighted, it could open up the floodgates for other developers to create similar games. On the other hand, if Nexxon is successful in proving that Ironmace stole assets from P3, it could set a precedent for developers not to reuse code or assets from their previous projects, even if they were not used by their previous employer.
P2Pah provides cheap Dark And Darker Gold, easily & safely buy DAD Gold at low prices, fast delivery, safe transaction, 24/7 LIVECHAT guarantee the best service for you! Have a good shopping!
The case of Dark and Darker also raises questions about ownership of ideas. In many game development contracts, the studio owns the intellectual property created by its employees. However, if an idea is pitched and worked on by a team within a studio, but ultimately rejected by the studio, who owns the idea? Is it the studio's idea because it happened under its roof, or the individual or team's idea who had the idea, cultivated it, raised it, and perfected it, only to have it thrown in the trash?
The language used by Ironmace's website, which describes the studio as a "by the gamers, for the gamers" establishment, suggests that they are trying to position themselves as the underdog fighting against greedy corporate game companies. However, it is important to note that we are only getting one side of the story. The game has been pulled from Steam until the matter is settled, and it is foolish to take the word of one party without hearing the other side.
It is also worth considering the potential consequences of this case beyond Dark and Darker. If Ironmace is successful in proving that game genres cannot be copyrighted, it could open up the floodgates for other developers to create similar games. On the other hand, if Nexxon is successful in proving that Ironmace stole assets from P3, it could set a precedent for developers not to reuse code or assets from their previous projects, even if they were not used by their previous employer.
P2Pah provides cheap Dark And Darker Gold, easily & safely buy DAD Gold at low prices, fast delivery, safe transaction, 24/7 LIVECHAT guarantee the best service for you! Have a good shopping!